DLS0#traceroute 166.56.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 166.56.1.1

  1   10.0.0.2        16 msec   4 msec    31 msec
  2   192.17.5.1      32 msec   33 msec   17 msec
  3   160.45.34.1     78 msec   37 msec   50 msec
  4   166.56.1.1      49 msec   97 msec   94 msec
DLS0#traceroute 192.168.101.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 192.168.101.1


  1   192.168.101.1   32 msec   16 msec   31 msec
DLS0#ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 166.56.1.1
Repeat count [5]: 50
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]: y
Source address or interface: 192.168.101.2
Type of service [0]:
Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
Validate reply data? [no]:
Data pattern [0xABCD]:
Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
Sweep range of sizes [n]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 50, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 166.56.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.101.2
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.........................
Success rate is 50 percent (25/50), round-trip min/avg/max = 19/44/78 ms

DLS0#sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
       * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
       P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       10.0.0.0 is directly connected, Port-channel 2
     16.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
R       16.16.20.0 [120/7] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
R       16.16.30.0 [120/7] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
     160.45.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       160.45.34.0 [120/2] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
     164.24.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       164.24.5.0 [120/5] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
     165.15.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       165.15.20.0 [120/2] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
     166.56.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       166.56.1.0 [120/3] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
     169.10.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
R       169.10.10.0 [120/4] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
R       169.10.15.0 [120/4] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
R       169.10.55.0 [120/4] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
     170.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       170.16.30.0 [120/3] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
     172.16.0.0/30 is subnetted, 4 subnets
R       172.16.1.0 [120/4] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
R       172.16.2.0 [120/3] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
R       172.16.3.0 [120/3] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
R       172.16.4.0 [120/3] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
     172.30.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       172.30.6.0 [120/6] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
R    192.17.5.0/24 [120/1] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
C    192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
C    192.168.15.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan15
C    192.168.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan20
C    192.168.55.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan55
     192.168.101.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
R       192.168.101.0/24 [120/4] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
C       192.168.101.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/3
     209.165.201.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       209.165.201.0 [120/4] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:28, Port-channel 2
DLS0#

NB****
Well, I have decided to look for a network with more devices to see the impact of convergence, where routing & topology tables are large. This is also due to the number of devices I can avail to myself since these days the MIT lab is busy. The only disadvantage is that some commands are not incorporated in packet tracer.